issued by the Registrar of the Court  
ECHR 048 (2025)  
18.02.2025  
Judgments of 18 February 2025  
The European Court of Human Rights has today notified in writing three Chamber judgments1 which  
are summarised below.  
The judgments summarised below are available only in English.  
Just Satisfaction  
Alasgarov and Others v. Azerbaijan (application no. 32088/11)  
The applicants are 21 Azerbaijani nationals.  
The case concerns a dispute over plots of land that had been allocated to the applicants by the  
Agrarian Reform Commission in Absheron for agricultural use. The Absheron District Mehdiabad  
Municipality later notified some of the applicants that their plots would be reallocated so that the  
State could make use of the land for construction purposes.  
On 10 November 2022 the Court found a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of  
property) to the European Convention on Human Rights, but reserved the question of just  
satisfaction.  
In its judgment today the Court held that the respondent State should remove all obstacles  
restricting the applicants’ free access to their plots of land and should pay them compensation in  
respect of the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage suffered. Details of the amounts awarded are  
appended to the judgment.  
Objective Television and Radio Broadcasting Company and Others v. Azerbaijan  
(no. 257/12)  
The applicants are Objective Television and Radio Broadcasting Company (Obyektiv Televiziya və  
Radio Yayım Şirkəti), a company based in Azerbaijan, and three Azerbaijani nationals, Mehman  
Yadulla oglu Aliyev, Emin Rafik oglu Huseynov and Rasul Agahasan oglu Jafarov, who were born in  
1957, 1979 and 1984 respectively and live in Baku.  
All four were involved in bids for radio station licences: Mr Aliyev and Mr Huseynov as owners and  
staff members of the applicant company; and Mr Jafarov in a separate bid by Alternativ Radio. The  
bid was ultimately won by a company called Golden Prince LLC for a radio station named Free News  
Radio.  
Relying on Article 10 (freedom of expression), of the European Convention, the applicants complain  
of the refusal to grant them a broadcasting licence.  
Violation of Article 10  
1
Under Articles 43 and 44 of the Convention, Chamber judgments are not final. During the three-month period following a Chamber  
judgment’s delivery, any party may request that the case be referred to the Grand Chamber of the Court. If such a request is made, a  
panel of five judges considers whether the case deserves further examination. In that event, the Grand Chamber will hear the case and  
deliver a final judgment. If the referral request is refused, the Chamber judgment will become final on that day. Under Article 28 of the  
Convention, judgments delivered by a Committee are final.  
Once a judgment becomes final, it is transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe for supervision of its execution.  
Further information about the execution process can be found here: www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution  
Just satisfaction:  
To the applicant company and the second and third applicants jointly:  
non-pecuniary damage: 4,500 euros (EUR)  
costs and expenses: EUR 2,000  
Romanchenko and Kharazishvili v. Georgia (nos. 33067/22 and 37832/22)  
The applicants, Ana Romanchenko and Nika Kharazishvili, are Georgian nationals who were born in  
1989 and 1990 respectively and live in Tbilisi.  
The case concerns the interception and recording of the applicants’ telephone communications  
within the framework of criminal proceedings for allegedly planning to sell 400,000 packs of  
cigarettes without excise stamps.  
Ms Romanchenko complains under Article 6 (right to a fair trial), and both applicants complain under  
Article 8 of the Convention that the interception and recording of their telephone communications  
violated their right to respect for their private life and correspondence.  
Violation of Article 8 in respect of both applicants  
Just satisfaction:  
non-pecuniary damage: EUR 1,500 to each applicant  
costs and expenses: EUR 73 to the applicants jointly  
This press release is a document produced by the Registry. It does not bind the Court. Decisions,  
judgments  
and  
further  
information  
about  
the  
Court  
can  
be  
found  
on  
https://www.echr.coe.int/home. To receive the Court’s press releases, please subscribe here:  
www.echr.coe.int/RSS/en or follow us on X (Twitter) @ECHR_CEDH and Bluesky @echr.coe.int.  
Press contacts  
[email protected]e.int | tel.: +33 3 90 21 42 08  
We are happy to receive journalists’ enquiries via either email or telephone.  
Tracey Turner-Tretz (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 35 30)  
Denis Lambert (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 41 09)  
Inci Ertekin (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 55 30)  
Neil Connolly (tel.: + 33 3 90 21 48 05)  
Jane Swift (tel.: + 33 3 88 41 29 04)  
The European Court of Human Rights was set up in Strasbourg by the Council of Europe member  
States in 1959 to deal with alleged violations of the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights.  
2