THIRD SECTION
CASE OF MARGOVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 38691/21 and 31 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
11 December 2025
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Margovich and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Úna Ní Raifeartaigh, President,
Mateja Đurović,
Vasilka Sancin, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 20 November 2025,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID‑19‑related restrictions. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). It further refers to Nemytov and Others v. Russia, nos. 1257/21 and 2 others, 27 May 2025, in so far as the application by the authorities of the COVID-19-related restrictions to assemblies are concerned.
9. In the leading cases of Nemytov and Others, cited above, Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 9-13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 11 December 2025, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Úna Ní Raifeartaigh
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant’s name Year of birth
| Representative’s name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative / criminal offence | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] | |
38691/21 15/07/2021 | Vladislav Georgiyevich MARGOVICH 1997
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally in support of A Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 4 days | St Petersburg City Court 25/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 5.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
50394/21 30/09/2021 | Irina Aleksandrovna MAMSUROVA 2001
| Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg | Rally in support of A Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | St Petersburg City Court 01/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
50397/21 30/09/2021 | Entoni Aleks MZILANGVE 1995
| Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg | Rally in support of A Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 18,000 | St Petersburg City Court 01/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
50399/21 30/09/2021 | Roman Vladimirovich PISAREVSKIY 1999
| Zyryanova Mariya Sergeyevna St Petersburg | Rally in support of A Navalnyy
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | St Petersburg City Court 01/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 to 01/02/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
54533/21 18/10/2021 | Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich DENISOV 1989
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally in support of A Navalnyy
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 28/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 to 4.00 p.m. on 22/04/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
59080/21 27/11/2021 | Andrey Genrikhovich BESEDIN 2002
| Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally in support of A Navalnyy
St Petersburg
23/01/2021 | article 8.6.1 § 2 of the Law of St Petersburg on administrative offences | fine of RUB 4,000 | Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg 29/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 1.20 p.m. on 23/01/2021 to 1.00 a.m. on 24/01/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
24057/22 09/02/2022 | Denis Mikhaylovich OLSHIN 1989
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally in support of A Navalnyy
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | St Petersburg City Court 17/08/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 to 6.00 p.m. on 22/04/2021,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
34233/22 29/06/2022 | Yekaterina Vasilyevna AYDAROVA 2001
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
27/02/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 5 days | St Petersburg City Court 03/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.15 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 10.30 a.m. on 28/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
34613/22 29/06/2022 | Anastasiya Vladimirovna MAKSIMOVA 1997
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 15/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 4.00 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 5.00 p.m. on 07/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
34838/22 01/07/2022 | Anton Aleksandrovich NIKITIN 1992
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
01/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 04/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.35 p.m. on 01/03/2022 to 10.00 a.m. on 02/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
35209/22 25/06/2022 | Anna Yuryevna ARKHIPOVA 1996
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
27/02/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 12 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.20 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 6.15 p.m. on 28/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
35539/22 05/07/2022 | Anton Andreyevich CHEREPOV 1991
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 15 days | St Petersburg City Court 10/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 3.00 p.m. on 07/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
35662/22 05/07/2022 | Olga Aleksandrovna KOSHKAROVA 1988
| Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 7 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 4.55 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 2.30 p.m. on 07/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
35808/22 05/07/2022 | Leonid Yevgenyevich VINOGRADOV 1968
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Rally in support of A. Navalnyy
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | St Petersburg City Court 22/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 10.15 p.m. on 21/04/2021 to 4.00 p.m. on 22/04/2021
| 4,000 | |
36505/22 04/07/2022 | Daliya Fedorovna MESHCHANKINA 1993
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
27/02/2022 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 04/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.25 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 4.00 p.m. on 01/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
36692/22 04/07/2022 | Yekaterina Mikhaylovna KUCHINSKAYA 1987
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
27/02/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 5 days | St Petersburg City Court 04/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.20 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 12.00 a.m. on 28/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
36820/22 11/07/2022 | Aleksandr Aleksandrovich KONONOV 1997
| Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 5 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 3.40 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 07/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
36823/22 11/07/2022 | Anna Vyacheslavovna GUK 1997
| Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
06/03/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 5 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.22 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 3.10 p.m. on 07/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
36827/22 11/07/2022 | Mark Vyacheslavovich KHUAKO 1995
| Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.22 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 2.15 p.m. on 07/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
36837/22 11/07/2022 | Matvey Mikhaylovich ANTIPOV 1995
| Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 7 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.25 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 3.00 p.m. on 07/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
38569/22 25/07/2022 | Dmitriy Nikolayevich MASHKIN 1988
| Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
24/02/2022 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 29/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 7.30 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 1.10 p.m. on 26/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
39864/22 29/07/2022 | Vasilisa Dmitriyevna SATIRSKAYA 1983
| Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
24/02/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | St Petersburg City Court 29/03/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 9.00 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 5.45 p.m. on 26/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
39990/22 04/08/2022 | Petr Mikhaylovich POPOV 1995
| Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
24/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.03 p.m. on 24/02/2022 to 9.00 p.m. on 25/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
39993/22 04/08/2022 | Sergey Nikolayevich KABEYEV 1989
| Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
27/02/2022 | article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 07/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 4.00 p.m. on 28/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
40063/22 03/08/2022 | Kira Iosifovna KOVALENKO 1979
| Vasilchenko Olesya Anatolyevna Minyar | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 07/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.15 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 11.00 a.m. on 07/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
41050/22 29/07/2022 | Natalya Igorevna BALAYEVA 1984
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
27/02/2022 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000 | St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - unlawful deprivation of liberty: escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 8.10 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 4.25 a.m. on 28/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
41061/22 14/08/2022 | Vladislav Viktorovich ISAKOV 1995
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
25/02/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 28/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 9.30 p.m. on 25/02/2022 to 3.00 a.m. on 26/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
41339/22 15/08/2022 | Dmitriy Sergeyevich SARYCHEV 1989
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
27/02/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.00 p.m. on 27/02/2022 to 1.30 p.m. on 28/02/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
41987/22 05/08/2022 | Viktoriya Konstantinovna ZAVALSKAYA 2002
| Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 5 days | St Petersburg City Court 05/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 6.22 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 1.30 p.m. on 07/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
44561/22 19/08/2022 | Yevgeniya Gennadyevna TOLOKONNIKOVA 1986
| Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | 50 hours of community works | St Petersburg City Court 19/04/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 2.40 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 12.20 a.m. on 07/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
45082/22 28/08/2022 | Aleksandr Arsenyevich ROGINSKIY 1989
| Krikun Leonid Leonidovich St Petersburg | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
24/02/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | administrative detention of 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 28/04/2022 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
48738/22 30/09/2022 | Vyacheslav Ramisovich ASTREDINOV 1988
| Baranova Natalya Andreyevna Moscow | Anti-war rally
St Petersburg
06/03/2022 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | St Petersburg City Court 31/05/2022 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to a police station for the purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; detention in excess of 3 hours and without “exceptional circumstances”, from 5.10 p.m. on 06/03/2022 to 5.00 a.m. on 07/03/2022,
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.