THIRD SECTION
CASE OF MALYKHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 42001/21 and 32 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
16 October 2025
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Malykhina and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Diana Kovatcheva, President,
Canòlic Mingorance Cairat,
Vasilka Sancin, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 25 September 2025,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained about the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID‑19‑related restrictions. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). It further refers to Nemytov and Others v. Russia, no. 1257/21 and 2 others, 27 May 2025, in so far as the application by the authorities of the COVID-19-related restrictions to the assemblies is concerned.
9. In the leading cases of Nemytov and Others (cited above, §§ 136-51) the Court found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case (see further Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013).
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
12. The applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 10-13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 16 October 2025, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Diana Kovatcheva
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant’s name Year of birth
| Representative’s name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative / criminal offence | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non‑pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] | |
42001/21 05/08/2021 | Regina Yakovlevna MALYKHINA 2000
| Loktev Sergey Aleksandrovich St Petersburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
02/02/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 09/03/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
42042/21 14/08/2021 | Diana Aleksandrovna CHURDALEVA 1996
| Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally " Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 7 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
42174/21 05/08/2021 | Nikita Sergeyevich US 1998
| Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 11 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/02/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 11.10 a.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
42339/21 08/08/2021 | Viktoriya Viktorovna ZHUCHENKO 1994
| Belozerov Aleksey Sergeyevich St PEtersburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 09/02/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
42378/21 18/08/2021 | Mikhail Mikhaylovich PUSHKAREV 1991
| Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
42539/21 10/08/2021 | Sergey Viktorovich GALAYBO 1971
| Cherkasov Vitaliy Viktorovich St Petersburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 7 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/03/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 5,000 | |
46212/21 02/09/2021 | Vitaliy Konstantinovich FILATOV 1988
| Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg | Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 5 days | St Petersburg City Court 02/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 1 p.m. until 9 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
46232/21 01/09/2021 | Olga Vasilyevna BAKHAREVA 1989
| Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg | Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 16/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 6.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4.45 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
51393/21 30/09/2021 | Aleksey Aleksandrovich GUSHCHIN 1993
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | St Petersburg City Court 08/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 9 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
52705/21 22/10/2021 | Nil Vadimovich PETSKO 1989
| Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 29/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01/02/2021 (released after the court hearing);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
52741/21 15/10/2021 | Mikhail Viktorovich SHEVCHENKO 1984
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 5 days | St Petersburg City Court 29/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 7.15 p.m. on 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
53502/21 13/10/2021 | Georgiy Alekseyevich MEDVINSKIY 1987
| Mikhaylova Kseniya Andreyevna St Petersburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | St Petersburg City Court 13/04/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
53801/21 26/10/2021 | Ruslan Ildarovich GALIYEV 1998
| Loktev Sergey Aleksandrovich St Petersburg | Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 17/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 9.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 22/04/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
54429/21 27/10/2021 | Aleksandr Anatolyevich BASHKIROV 1984
| Bayeva Aleksandra Nikolayevna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 12,000 | St Petersburg City Court 20/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.44 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 9 p.m. on 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
55653/21 22/10/2021 | Rafael Radikovich ABDRAFIKOV 2002
| MOO MEMORIAL Human Rights Centre St Petersburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 5 days | St Petersburg City Court 28/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8.20 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 22/04/2021, when the applicant was taken to the court;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
55851/21 05/11/2021 | Kirill Andreyevich BOGATYRENKO 1992
| Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
23/01/2021 | article 8-6-1 § 2 of the Law of St Petersburg on Administrative Offences in St Petersburg | fine RUB 4,000 | Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg 18/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
56493/21 27/10/2021 | Alisa Olegovna DELOVA 1994
| MOO MEMORIAL Human Rights Centre St Petersburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 27/04/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
56815/21 22/10/2021 | Vladislav Sergeyevich ZIMIREV 1996
| Cherkasov Vitaliy Viktorovich St Petersburg | Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
02/02/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 6 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
56842/21 22/10/2021 | Georgiy Konstantinovich SIZYKH 1996
| Cherkasov Vitaliy Viktorovich St Petersburg | Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
02/02/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 11/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 5 p.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
56896/21 10/11/2021 | Anastasiya Igorevna BESKHMELNAYA 1993
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 24/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3.58 p.m. until 10 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
57144/21 29/10/2021 | Anton Vladimirovich VITSKIY 1990
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 12 days | St Petersburg City Court 29/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 9 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 7.45 p.m. on 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 6,000 | |
57711/21 26/10/2021 | Svetlana Gennadyevna BEZUGLOVA 1989
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 12 days | St Petersburg City Court 27/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.20 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 2 a.m. on 22/04/2022;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 6,000 | |
57861/21 11/11/2021 | Dmitriy Sergeyevich PAPORT 1985
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 13/05/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
59389/21 25/11/2021 | Aleksandr Sergeyevich ZAKAMALDIN 1979
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 17/06/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
59447/21 25/11/2021 | Yelena Yuryevna PLAKSINA 1970
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 10/06/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
| 3,500 | |
59451/21 25/11/2021 | Rustam Kayratovich SULEYMENOV 1995
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 15/06/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
60029/21 03/12/2021 | Maksim Aleksandrovich ZEMSKIY 1993
| Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
23/01/2021 | article 8-6-1 § 2 of St Petersburg Decree No 273-70 | fine of RUB 4,000 | Oktyabrskiy District Court of St Petersburg 06/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
61110/21 06/12/2021 | Dmitriy Mikhaylovich ZOBNIN 2002
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 08/06/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. until 11.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
61320/21 27/11/2021 | Daroslav Aleksandrovich SKIBA 2003
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally “Free Navalnyy”
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 27/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 4.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 3.20 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
| 4,000 | |
2046/22 22/12/2021 | Anna Igorevna MICHURINA 1986
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Medical care to Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 15/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 9 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until noon on 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
| 4,000 | |
3824/22 22/12/2021 | Sergey Aleksandrovich BULTYKOV 1984
| Semenov Daniil Aleksandrovich St Petersburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy’
St Petersburg
21/04/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 22/06/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO. | 5,000 | |
6351/22 11/01/2022 | Aleksandra Sergeyevna ABDUGAPAROVA 1990
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | St Petersburg City Court 13/07/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 3 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 9 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
7345/22 20/01/2022 | Dmitriy Vitalyevich GLOBOV 1996
| Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 20/07/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.