THIRD SECTION

CASE OF LEKIASHVILLI AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 21113/21 and 27 others –

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

STRASBOURG

18 September 2025

 

 

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

 


In the case of Lekiashvilli and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Diana Kovatcheva, President,
 Canòlic Mingorance Cairat,
 Vasilka Sancin, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 28 August 2025,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.

2.  The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS

3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4.  The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, notably in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. JURISDICTION

6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 6873, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION

7.  The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies in connection with their participation in various public events in breach of COVID-19-related restrictions, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.

8.  The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009). It further refers to Nemytov and Others, no. 1257/21 and 2 Others, 27 May 2025, in so far as the application by the authorities of the COVID-19-related restrictions to assemblies are concerned.

9.  In the leading cases of Nemytov and Others, cited above, Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014, and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

10.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.

11.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW

12.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.

13.  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Glukhin v. Russia, no. 11519/20, §§ 64-91, 4 July 2023, concerning processing of applicants’ personal biometric data by using highly intrusive facial recognition technology in administrative-offence proceedings in order to identify, locate and arrest them; Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO), Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, concerning the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.

  1. REMAINING COMPLAINTS

14.  Some applicants raised further additional complaints under the Convention concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

15.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its caselaw (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remainder of the applications;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
  6. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 18 September 2025, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 

 Viktoriya Maradudina Diana Kovatcheva

 Acting Deputy Registrar President 

 

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

 

Representative’s name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative / criminal offence

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and nonpecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

  1.    

21113/21

06/04/2021

Yelena Nikolayevna LEKIASHVILLI

1979

 

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Rally in support of A. Navalnyy

 

Yaroslavl

 

23/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

detention for 10 days

Yaroslavl Regional Court

28/01/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 7 p.m. on 23/01/2021 and 11 a.m. on 25/01/2021.

5,000

  1.    

42307/21

04/08/2021

Yegor Timofeyevich NECHAYEV

2001

 

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Anti-war rally

 

St Petersburg

 

27/02/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

detention for 3 days

St Petersburg City Court

12/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 10.50 p.m. on 27/02/2022 and 4 a.m. on 28/02/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

 

5,000

  1.    

49175/21

28/09/2021

Yelena Olegovna SAVELYEVA

1988

 

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg Regional Court

13/04/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 12.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 00.10 a.m. on 01/02/2021.

 

 

4,000

  1.    

49365/21

22/09/2021

Anna Alekseyevna KRASILNIKOVA

2002

 

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

08/06/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.50 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 01 a.m. on 01/02/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceeding.

4,000

  1.    

53975/21

17/10/2021

Maksim Vyacheslavovich SAMOYLOV

1997

 

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

20/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 3.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 1 a.m. on 01/02/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.    

55645/21

22/10/2021

Leonid Igorevich KOVALEV

2002

 

MOO MEMORIAL Human Rights Centre

St Petersburg

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

detention for 8 days

St Petersburg City Court

28/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.10 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 6 p.m. on 22/04/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings

 

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.

 

5,000

  1.    

55655/21

22/10/2021

Mikhail Nikolayevich ALEKSEYEV

1997

 

MOO MEMORIAL Human Rights Centre

St Petersburg

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

detention for 5 days

St Petersburg City Court

06/07/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO,

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 4.05 p.m. on 22/04/2021.

5,000

  1.    

56500/21

27/10/2021

Aleksandr Mikhaylovich SUKHANOV

1988

 

MOO MEMORIAL Human Rights Centre

St Petersburg

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

detention for 7 days

St Petersburg City Court

27/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 7.30 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 2.30 p.m. on 22/04/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

5,000

  1.    

59266/21

12/11/2021

Aliya Ramilevna ILYASOVA

1991

 

Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna

St Petersburg

Rally in support of A. Navalnyy

 

St Petersburg

 

23/01/2021

St Petersburg Government Decree of 13/03/2020 related to anti-COVID-19 measures

fine of

RUB 4,000

Kuybyshevskiy District Court of St Petersburg

13/05/2021

 

 

3,500

  1.  

2069/22

15/12/2021

Stanislav Yuryevich YAVORSKIY

1972

 

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

22/06/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

3,500

  1.  

2138/22

15/12/2021

Viktoriya Aleksandrovna POPUGAYEVA

2001

 

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

 

St Petersburg

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

detention for 2 days

St Petersburg City Court

17/06/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

3,500

  1.  

4500/22

24/12/2021

Sergey Savelyevich FEDEYEV

1972

 

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Rally " Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

29/06/2021

 

3,500

  1.  

6203/22

30/12/2021

Aleksandr Vitalyevich BLINOV

1974

 

Sutormina Yekaterina Leonidovna

St Petersburg

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

02/09/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.28 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 7 p.m. on 01/02/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

7515/22

27/01/2022

Anita Aleksandrovna FRANTSKEVICH

2000

 

 

 

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Voronezh

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

27/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 7.35 p.m. until 11.40 p.m. on 21/04/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

8027/22

26/01/2022

Maksim Sergeyevich AGAFONOV

1999

 

Kochenkov Viktor Valeryevich

Izhevsk

Rally “Free Navalnyy”

 

Izhevsk

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of 10,000 RUB

Supreme Court of the Udmurt Republic

26/07/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station for compiling an offence report from 8 p.m. until 11.40 p.m. on 21/04/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

8265/22

02/02/2022

Yuliya Yevgenyevna CHAPURINA

1991

 

Kuroptev Aleksey Mikhaylovich

Balashikha

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

Arkhangelsk

 

21/04/2021

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 11,000

Arkhangelsk Regional Court

03/08/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Art. 8 (2) - restrictions on the right to private life of participants in public assemblies - use of facial recognition technology for the identification of the applicant as a participant of a rally and her subsequent conviction.

4,000

  1.  

12281/22

24/02/2022

Ramunas Gintaro RIMIDIS

1991

 

Maltsev Konstantin Aleksandrovich

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

31/08/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 12.40 p.m. on 31/01/2021 and 3.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

 

 

4,000

  1.  

13885/22

28/02/2022

Arina Vladimirovna MIKHEYEVA

2000

 

Prosvirkina Kseniya Dmitriyevna

Moscow

Rally "Free Navalnyy"

 

St Petersburg

 

31/01/2021

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

31/08/2021

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.10 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 04.30 a.m. on 01/02/2021.

4,000

  1.  

39911/22

19/07/2022

Nikolay Yuryevich RABOVSKIY

1997

 

Magomedova Luiza Magomedovna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)

 

St Petersburg

 

24/02/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

19/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 8.40 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and 02.39 a.m. on 25/02/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

39914/22

29/07/2022

Darya Vladimirovna ULBASHEVA

2002

 

Magomedova Luiza Magomedovna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)

 

St Petersburg

 

24/02/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

19/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 8 p.m. on 24/02/2022 and 02.08 a.m. on 25/02/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

39977/22

05/08/2022

Artem Andreyevich UGRYUMOV

2000

 

Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)

 

 

St Petersburg

 

26/02/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg

21/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 8.50 p.m. on 26/02/2022 and 02.29 a.m. on 27/02/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

40528/22

08/08/2022

Marat Faizovich NUREYEV

1991

 

Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)

 

St Petersburg

 

26/02/2022

article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

detention for 8 days

St Petersburg City Court

21/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 8.50 p.m. on 26/02/2022 and 4.20 a.m. on 27/02/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

5,000

  1.  

40705/22

10/08/2022

German Aleksandrovich VERSILOV

1993

 

Nepovinnova Yana Andreyevna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)

 

 

St Petersburg

 

28/02/2022

article 20.2.2. § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

24/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 11.15 p.m. on 28/02/2022 and 04.20 a.m. on 01/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

41668/22

09/08/2022

Yekaterina Sergeyevna BROSALINA

1996

 

Magomedova Luiza Magomedovna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)

 

St Petersburg

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

detention for 10 days

St Petersburg City Court

14/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 6 p.m. on 06/03/2022 and 4.34 a.m. on 07/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings,

 

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.

5,000

  1.  

41674/22

09/08/2022

Mariya Igorevna ASTASHINA

1991

 

Magomedova Luiza Magomedovna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)

 

St Petersburg

 

06/03/2022

article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

detention for 1 day

St Petersburg City Court

12/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 7 p.m. and 11.30 p.m. on 06/03/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

41677/22

09/08/2022

Anton Aleksandrovich FEDOROV

2000

 

Magomedova Luiza Magomedovna

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)

 

St Petersburg

 

27/02/2022

article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

19/04/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report between 00.06 a.m. and 07.46 a.m. on 28/02/2022,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

46302/22

03/09/2022

Anastasiya Olegovna KHLYUBTSEVA

1992

 

Shiolashvili Mikhail Germanovich

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)

 

St Petersburg

 

27/02/2022

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

05/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 27/02/2022 for compiling an offence report,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

  1.  

46328/22

03/09/2022

Leonid Vladimirovich NIKOLAYEV

1972

 

Shiolashvili Mikhail Germanovich

St Petersburg

Anti-war protest (against war in Ukraine)

 

St Petersburg

 

24/02/2022

article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

17/05/2022

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 24/02/2022 for compiling an offence report,

 

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.

4,000

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.