FIRST SECTION

CASE OF NAZAROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 23242/20 and 49 others –

see appended list)

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

STRASBOURG

12 September 2024

 

 

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

 


In the case of Nazarov and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

 Péter Paczolay, President,
 Gilberto Felici,
 Raffaele Sabato, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 11 July 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1.  The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.

2.  The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS

3.  The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4.  The applicants complained about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

  1. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

  1. Jurisdiction

6.  The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 6873, 17 January 2023).

  1. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION on account of confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom

7.  The applicants complained principally about their confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom during the criminal proceedings against them. They relied on Article 3 of the Convention.

8.  The Court notes that the applicants were kept in a metal cage in the courtroom in the context of their trial. In the leading cases of Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, ECHR 2014 (extracts) and Vorontsov and Others v. Russia, no. 59655/14 and 2 others, 31 January 2017, the Court already dealt with the issue of the use of metal cages in courtrooms and found that such a practice constituted in itself an affront to human dignity and amounted to degrading treatment prohibited by Article 3 of the Convention.

9.  Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having taken into account the issue of compliance with the six-month time-limit under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Saakashvili v. Georgia (dec.), nos. 6232/20 and 22394/20, §§ 46-59, 1 March 2022, in which the Court addressed the COVIDrelated extension of the period in question), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion on the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its caselaw on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the applicants’ confinement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them amounted to degrading treatment.

10.  These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention.

  1. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW

11.  Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table). These complaints are not manifestly illfounded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see Tomov and Others v. Russia, nos. 18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 114-56, 9 April 2019, concerning conditions of detention during transport and the lack of an effective remedy in that respect).

  1. REMAINING COMPLAINTS

12.  In view of the above findings under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with the applicants’ remaining complaints under Article 13 of the Convention (for similar approach see Valyuzhenich v. Russia, no. 10597/13, § 27, 26 March 2019).

  1. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

13.  Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its caselaw (see, in particular, Vorontsov and Others, cited above), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

  1. Decides to join the applications;
  2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
  3. Declares the complaints under Article 3 of the Convention about the applicants’ placement in a meatal cage in the course of the criminal proceedings against them and other complaints raised under the wellestablished case-law of the Court, as indicated in the attached table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints about the lack of effective domestic remedies to complain about the use of metal cages and other security arrangements in the courtrooms under Article 13 of the Convention;
  4. Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 3 of the Convention on account of the applicants’ placement in a metal cage before the court during the criminal proceedings against them;
  5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention as regards the other complaints raised under well-established case-law of the Court (see the appended table);
  6. Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 12 September 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

 

 Viktoriya Maradudina Péter Paczolay

 Acting Deputy Registrar President

 

 


APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 3 of the Convention

(use of metal cages and/or other security arrangements in courtrooms)

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

 

Name of the court

Date of the relevant judgment/End date of the placement in a metal cage

Other complaints under well-established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)[1]

  1.    

23242/20

12/05/2020

Yevgeniy Vladimirovich NAZAROV

1984

Lomonosovskiy District Court of Arkhangelsk

24/01/2020

 

7,500

  1.    

23933/20

22/05/2020

Denis Aleksandrovich SADOVSKIY

1987

Tobolsk Town Court of the Tyumen Region

23/12/2019

 

7,500

  1.    

24043/20

22/05/2020

Tynchtykbek Avazbekovich ZHOLBOLDUYEV

1984

Military Court of the Central Circuit

17/02/2020

 

7,500

  1.    

24445/20

18/05/2020

Natalya Nikolayevna RAZUMNAYA

1981

Leninskiy District Court of Rostov-on-Don; Rostov Regional Court

In person at courts and via video link (location not specified)

27/04/2021

 

7,500

  1.    

24700/20

08/06/2020

Ivan Yevgenyevich ONKOV

1983

Zheleznododrozhniy District Court of Krasnoyarsk (confinement in a metal cage during studying of a case-file)

23/12/2019

 

7,500

  1.    

24827/20

29/05/2020

Oleg Radikovich GIMAZOV

1993

Novo-Savinovskiy Distric Court of Kazan, Tatarstan Republic

29/10/2019

 

7,500

  1.    

25038/20

10/04/2020

Pavel Vitalyevich LUBENTSOV

1981

Detention in a metal cage on multiple occasions during the detention and trial hearings at the Frunzenskiy District Court of Saint Petersburg

29/06/2020

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport between the remand prison and the Frunzenskiy District Court of St Petersburg on multiple occasions from 27/12/2018 to 29/06/2020 (0.2-0.3 sq. m per inmate, overcrowding, no individual seat); time of transfer from 2 to 4 hours;

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

8,500

  1.    

25417/20

18/05/2020

Gennadiy Vladimirovich RUSAKOV

1985

Pushkinskiy District Court of St Petersburg

On-going placement in a cage on the date when the application was lodged with the Court

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - poor conditions of transport; since 10/07/2018 to 21/11/2019 between the detention facility and the courthouses; van and transit cell; 0.7 sq. m of personal space; overcrowding, lack of fresh air, no or restricted access to toilet

8,500

  1.    

25425/20

16/04/2020

Dmitriy Andreyevich ZAZDRAVNOV

1986

Tsentralnyi District Court of Krasnoyarsk

22/11/2019

 

 

7,500

  1.  

25721/20

19/03/2020

Mikhail Mikhaylovich KHOKHLOV

1980

Ezhvinskiy District Court of Syktyvkar of the Komi Republic

25/02/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

25758/20

04/06/2020

Abror Akhralovich AZIMOV

1990

Detention in a glass cabin during the hearings held on multiple occasions in the courtroom of the First Western Circuit Military Court (0.3 sq. m of personal space)

10/12/2019

 

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - van, numerous occasions of transport between the detention facility and the courthouse between 02/04/2019 and 10/12/2019; specific grievances: inadequate temperature, overcrowding (0.25 sq. m per inmate), no or restricted access to toilet, lack of fresh air

8,500

  1.  

26061/20

15/10/2020

Sarkis Samvelovich VAGANYAN

1997

Sverdlovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

On-going placement in a cage on the date when the application was lodged with the Court

 

7,500

  1.  

26068/20

28/04/2020

Maksim Sergeyevich TSATNEV

1986

Oktyabrskiy and Lomonosovskiy District Courts of Arkhangelsk

On-going placement in a cage on the date when the application was lodged with the Court

 

7,500

  1.  

26445/20

05/06/2020

Denis Aleksandrovich POPOV

1981

Kineshema Town Court of the Ivanovo Region, Ivanovo Regional Court

03/10/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

26478/20

04/08/2020

Nikolay Maksimovich MEDVEDEV

1993

Kalininskiy District Court of Tumen

11/06/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

26578/20

22/06/2020

Maksim Aleksandrovich PESHKOV

1981

Karymskiy District Court of the Zabaykalskiy Region; Zabaykalskiy Region Court

04/03/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

26608/20

22/04/2020

Mikhail Alekseyevich PATYUKOV

2000

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Arkhangelsk, Arkhangelsk Town Court

21/01/2021

 

7,500

  1.  

26649/20

16/04/2020

Aleksey Vladimirovich MESHCHERSKIY

1986

Tsentralniy District Court of Volgograd; Voroshilovskiy District Court of Volgograd; Volgograd Regional Court

On-going placement in a cage on the date when the application was lodged with the Court

 

7,500

  1.  

26841/20

21/05/2020

Vasiliy Ivanovich LOBANOV

1985

Priluzskiy District Court of the Komi Republic

26/11/2019

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - in prison trains on 07/11/2019, 08/11/2019, 17/11/2019 (bunk beds, lack of or poor quality of bedding and bed linen, no or restricted access to toilet, passive smoking, lack of fresh air, lack of or insufficient electric light);

 

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport

8,500

  1.  

26902/20

20/03/2020

Dmitriy Andreyevich VOLOZHENINOV

1985

Sosnogorsk Town Court

25/09/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

27287/20

08/05/2020

Artur Rishatovich BASMANOV

1987

Supreme Court of Republic of Bashkortostan;

Supreme Court of the Russian Federation; Video link from SIZO-3, Republic of Bashkortostan

12/12/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

28099/20

13/05/2020

Aleksandr Gennadyevich KOSTINEVICH

1966

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

10/03/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

28468/20

04/08/2020

Dmitriy Sergeyevich POLYAKOV

1979

Kirovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk; Sverdlovsk District Court of Krasnoyarsk

22/07/2020

 

 

 

 

 

7,500

  1.  

28493/20

19/05/2020

Vladimir Sergeyevich KAZACHKOV

1991

Sovetskiy District Court of Vladivostok, Primorye Regional Court; Fifth Appeal Court of General Jurisdiction;

Fifth Appeal Court of General Jurisdiction; Video link from unspecified SIZO; 16/03/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

28846/20

14/09/2020

Ilya Leonidovich GOLOVACH

1987

Inta Town Court of the Komi Republic

13/10/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

29380/20

03/04/2020

Mark Yevgenyevich PANTYUKHIN

 

Zavodskoy District Court of Kemerovo

04/12/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

29386/20

07/04/2020

Aleksandr Nikolyevich YEROSHEVICH

1973

Sovetskiy District Court of Khanty Mansiysk

18/09/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

29387/20

02/04/2020

Nauris Sairovich DAVLETBAKOV

1972

Tsentralnyy District Court of Tyumen

20/12/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

29390/20

02/04/2020

Aleksandr Vladislavovich IVANOV

1998

Tsentralnyy District Court of Tyumen

20/02/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

30272/20

29/08/2020

Kirill Petrovich MORGACH

1985

Severodvinsk Town Court of Arkhangelsk Region

16/03/2020

 

 

 

 

7,500

  1.  

30366/20

01/06/2020

Aleksey Nikolayevich SKVORTSOV

1979

Kirovskiy District Court of Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk Regional Court

On-going placement in a cage on the date when the application was lodged with the Court

 

7,500

  1.  

30386/20

27/10/2020

Sergey Vladimirovich FISENKO

1974

Ukhta Town Court of the Komi Republic

30/12/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

30570/20

17/04/2020

Ramis Railevich FAYZULLIN

1995

Naberezhnyye Chelny Town Court of the Republic of Tatarstan

02/12/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

30690/20

23/06/2020

Roman Aleksandrovich LEBEDEV

1983

Zheleznodorozhnyy District, Tsentranyy District and Oktyabrskiy District Courts of Krasnoyarsk

23/12/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

30950/20

17/06/2020

Aleksey Alekseyevich FROLENKO

1989

Military Court of the Vorkuta Garrison

30/12/2019

 

7,500

  1.  

33579/20

20/07/2020

Sergey Stepanovich DERZHIPILSKIY

1996

Privolzhskiy Circuit Military Court

05/02/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

33654/20

20/07/2020

Aleksandr Valeryevich IVANNIKOV

1990

Komsomolskiy District Court of the Khabarovsk Region and Fifth Appellate Court of Common Jurisdiction

21/01/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

35504/20

21/07/2020

Denis Nikolayevich VLASOV

1980

Tsentralniy District Court of Tumen

02/03/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

35682/20

21/07/2020

Denis Sergeyevich SPIRIDONOV

1977

Ezhvinsky District Court of Syktyvkar

22/07/2020

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transportation on numerous occasions between 28/03/2017 and 02/12/2020 (more than 100 times), 0.4 sq. m per person, inadequate furniture, no safety belts or other safety measures

8,500

  1.  

35685/20

21/07/2020

Yuriy Yuryevich POLITOV

1966

Ezhvinskiy District Court of Syktyvkar

22/07/2020

Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport;

 

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - van between 15/10/2017 and 01/10/2020 on numerous occasions (120 transfers from 20 to 50 minutes)

8,500

  1.  

35838/20

27/07/2020

Ilnar Ilyasovich ZYALILOV

1980

Privolzhskiy Circuit Military Court in the building of the Kazan Garrison Military Court

05/02/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

36408/20

29/07/2020

Maksim Aleksandrovich KLYUKVIN

1978

Justice of the Peace of Vorkuta, Komi Republic

05/06/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

36702/20

05/08/2020

Nikolay Vladimirovich KOCHETKOV

1990

Ezhvinskiy District Court of Syktyvkar

19/05/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

36824/20

03/08/2020

Ilnaz Ravilovich SAFIULLIN

1986

Privolzhye Military Circuit Court

05/02/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

37397/20

28/05/2020

Tatyana Sergeyevna SEZINA

1983

Tsivilskiy District Court of the Chuvashia Republic; Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic

26/02/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

37706/20

20/07/2020

Maksim Vitalyevich ZAVALIN

1982

Frunzenskiy District Court of St Petersburg

18/03/2020

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - numerous occasions of transport by prison van between the detention facilities and the courthouse from 29/12/2017 to 18/03/2020; 0.4 sq. m of personal space; accommodation with inmates under stricter regime, applicant transported on numerous occasions, lack of fresh air, mouldy or dirty cell, sharing cells with inmates infected with contagious disease, passive smoking, overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet

8,500

  1.  

37709/20

21/07/2020

Yuriy Andreyevich ANDREYEV

1985

Vasileostrovskiy District Court of St Petersburg

09/04/2020

Art. 3 - inadequate conditions of detention during transport - transport on numerous occasions by van between the detention facility and the courthouse from 04/07/2019 to 20/01/2020; overcrowding, no or restricted access to toilet, passive smoking

8,500

  1.  

38790/20

08/08/2020

Pavel Vladimirovich ANDRAKHANOV

1980

Oktyabrskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk

22/01/2020

 

7,500

  1.  

40443/20

16/06/2020

Yuriy Nikolayevich VARNIKOV

1985

Arkhangelsk Regional Court (glass cabin, nine defendants were placed in the cabin)

The criminal proceedings were pending as of 16/09/2022

 

7,500

  1.  

40998/20

27/08/2020

Yakov Yegorovich DAVYDOV

1974

Almetievsk Town Court of the Tatarstan Republic

30/07/2020

 

7,500

 

 


[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.