THIRD SECTION
CASE OF RECHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 13359/19 and 36 others –
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
25 May 2023
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Rechenko and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Peeter Roosma, President,
Ioannis Ktistakis,
Andreas Zünd, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 4 May 2023,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of country-wide protests against retirement age hike organised by Aleksey Navalnyy on 9 September 2018. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts); Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014; and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018; and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (“the CAO”); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect on an appeal against the sentence of detention; Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100-31, ECHR 2015, and Murtazaliyeva v. Russia [GC], no. 36658/05, §§ 150-59, 18 December 2018, relating to impossibility to question witnesses in a criminal trial (see the appended table).
14. Some applicants also raised other complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention concerning various aspects of their deprivation of liberty and fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
15. The Court has further examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 25 May 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
{signature_p_1} {signature_p_2}
Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant’s name Year of birth
| Representative’s name and location | Location of the public event
| Administrative charges | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] | |
13359/19 25/02/2019 | Boris Nikolayevich RECHENKO 1994 | Bushmakov Aleksey Vladimirovich Yekaterinburg | Yekaterinburg
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 14/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report (brought to the police station at 2.15 p.m. and released at 2.50 p.m. on 09/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
| 4,000 | |
14920/19 27/02/2019 | Dmitriy Aleksandrovich KUTLENKOV 2000 | Mikhaylova Polina Pavlovna Tyumen | St Petersburg
| Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 10 days | St Petersburg City Court 18/09/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – detention at a police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 5.45 p.m. and brought to police station at 6.10 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 10.40 a.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
| 5,000 | |
15637/19 12/03/2019 | Anastasiya Ivanovna KADETOVA (former SEMENOVA) 1998 | Vorobyev Viktor Viktorovich Syktyvkar | Volgograd
| Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | detention for 15 days | Volgograd Regional Court 12/09/2018 | Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance on 09/09/2018 was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.
| 5,000 | |
20104/19 01/04/2019 | Aleksandr Akeksandrovich NALIMOV 1987 | Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich Vladivostok | Vladivostok
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Primorye Regional Court 17/10/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
21598/19 01/04/2019 | Aleksandra Sergeyevna KORCHAGINA 2000 |
| St Petersburg
| Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 09/10/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – detention at a police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 5.05 p.m. and brought to the police station at 6.30 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 2.54 a.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
22606/19 07/04/2019 | Sergey Sergeyevich SAVINOV 1989 | Belozerov Aleksey Sergeyevich St Petersburg | St Petersburg
| Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | St Petersburg City Court 01/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 6.20 p.m. and brought to the police station at 10.50 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 3 p.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
24398/19 29/04/2019 | Yevgeniy Stanislavovich TALANKIN 1991 | Tiunov Sergey Yuryevich Yekaterinburg | Yekaterinburg
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 16/01/2019 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested and brought to the police station at 4.40 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 12.02 a.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
24818/19 20/04/2019 | Anton Aleksandrovich ROMANYUK 1982 | Mikhaylova Varvara Dmitriyevna St Petersburg | St Petersburg
| Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 4 days | St Petersburg City Court 01/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – detention at a police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 6.05 p.m. and brought to the police station on 09/09/2018, released at 2.30 p.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 5,000 | |
29920/19 11/05/2019 | Artem Aleksandrovich SAVASTEYEV 1994 | Olenichev Maksim Vladimirovich St Petersburg | St Petersburg
| Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | 20 hours of community work | St Petersburg City Court 18/10/2018 (the applicant was not informed of the final hearing in his case, was not served with a copy of the appeal decision and only learned about the appeal decision on 14/03/2019, as confirmed by the case-file materials) | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – detention at the police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 3.20 p.m. and brought to the police station at 5.15 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 6.05 p.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
30078/19 28/05/2019 | Yuriy Yuryevich SHAPOSHNIKOV 1987 | Karavayev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Nizhniy Novgorod | Nizhniy Novgorod
| Article 20.2 § 3 of CAO | detention for 12 days | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 29/11/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
| 5,000 | |
30260/19 21/05/2019 | Roman Viktorovich DOLMATOV 1971 | Shchukin Andrey Yevgenyevcich Nizhniy Tagil | Yekaterinburg
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 22/11/2018 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to the police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 4.20 p.m., brought to the police station at 8.45 p.m. and released at 11 p.m. on 09/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
31381/19 27/05/2019 | Nikita Sergeyevich VELTISHCHEV 1993 | Zinovyev Konstantin Mikhaylovich Nizhniy Novgorod | Nizhniy Novgorod
| Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | 40 hours of community work | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 29/11/2018 |
| 3,500 | |
31462/19 27/05/2019 | Sergey Yuryevich FIGUROV 2000 | Sozonov Ruslan Vladimirovich Nizhniy Novgorod | Nizhniy Novgorod
| Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | 60 hours of community work | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 06/12/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
32349/19 29/05/2019 | Svetlana Valeryevna BEKMANSUROVA 1991 | Koroleva Galina Vasilyevna Yekaterinburg | Yekaterinburg
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 25/12/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
| 3,500 | |
33446/19 11/06/2019 | Yevgeniy Georgiyevich TIPIKIN 1987 | Koroleva Galina Vasilyevna Yekaterinburg | Yekaterinburg
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 05/03/2019 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 3.50 p.m., brought to the police station at 4.40 p.m. and released at 11.54 p.m. on 09/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
33511/19 11/06/2019 | Dmitriy Igorevich REZNICHENKO 1990 | Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy d’Anjou | Komsomolsk-on-Amur
| Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Khabarovsk Regional Court 12/12/2018 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report (arrested and brought to the police station at 2.10 p.m. and released after 7 p.m. on 09/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
34626/19 17/06/2019 | Sergey Yegorovich PFAYFER 1969 | Chernyavskaya Andzhelika Viktorovna Oktyabrskiy | Novosibirsk
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Novosibirsk Regional Court 18/12/2018
|
| 3,500 | |
35098/19 20/06/2019 | Mikhail Fedorovich ABAKUMOV 1963 | Koroleva Galina Vasilyevna Yekaterinburg | Yekaterinburg
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 15/01/2019 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 3 p.m. and brought to the police station at 6.20 p.m. on 09/09/2018; released at 2.40 a.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
37430/19 01/07/2019 | Andrey Dmitriyevich MEDVEDSKIY 1991 |
| Yekaterinburg
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 16/01/2019 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 4.30 p.m. and brought to the police station at 6.20 p.m. on 09/09/2018; released at 2.30 a.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
| 4,000 | |
40133/19 19/07/2019 | Aleksey Aleksandrovich KOLYADA 1983 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Krasnoyarsk
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 31/01/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
43312/19 02/06/2019 | Aleksey Viktorovich NEMTSEV 1987 | Chernyavskaya Andzhelika Viktorovna Oktyabrskiy | Novosibirsk
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Novosibirsk Regional Court 22/01/2019
|
| 3,500 | |
43948/19 02/08/2019 | Nikolay Vladimirovich PETUKHOV 1991 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Yekaterinburg
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 06/02/2019 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 5 p.m. and brought to the police station at 6.20 p.m., released at 10.40 p.m. on 09/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
44374/19 13/08/2019 | Makar Viktorovich ALISOV 2000 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Yekaterinburg
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 13/02/2019 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 4.20 p.m. and brought to the police station at 4.40 p.m., released at 9.34 p.m. on 09/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
44375/19 01/08/2019 | Venzhik Ravilyevich GAFIULLIN 1987 | Koroleva Galina Vasilyevna Yekaterinburg | Yekaterinburg
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 20/02/2019 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 3.30 p.m. and brought to the police station at 6.30 p.m. on 09/09/2018; released at 2 a.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
44401/19 07/08/2019 | Yevgeniy Borisovich SMIRNOV 1993 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | St Petersburg
| Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO | fine of RUB 150,000 | St Petersburg City Court 28/02/2019 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – detention at a police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested at 2 p.m. and brought to the police station at 2.45 p.m. on 09/09/2018, released at 12.50 p.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 6,000 | |
46815/19 10/08/2019 | Denis Vladislavovich BEKMANSUROV 1990 | Koroleva Galina Vasilyevna Yekaterinburg | Yekaterinburg
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 10/04/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
| 3,500 | |
46953/19 28/08/2019 | Viktoriya Sergeyevna BRAGINA 2001 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Khabarovsk
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Khabarovsk Regional Court 15/03/2019 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty – detention at a police station in excess of three hours after the offence report was compiled (arrested and brought to the police station at 3.40 p.m., released at 6 p.m. on 09/09/2018) | 4,000 | |
47060/19 28/08/2019 | Yelena Vladimirovna KOCHKINA 1988 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Perm
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Perm Regional Court 14/03/2019 |
| 3,500 | |
47387/19 23/08/2019 | Tatyana Nikolayevna POVALIY 1977 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Belgorod
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 30 hours of community work | Belgorod Regional Court 11/02/2019 (received on 18/03/2019) | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
47474/19 28/08/2019 | Liliya Kurtovna OTTO 1965 | Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk | Krasnoyarsk
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 28/03/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings.
| 3,500 | |
48304/19 28/08/2019 | Aleksey Yuryevich KLIMISHIN 1996 | Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna Moscow | Moscow
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 28/02/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
49206/19 28/08/2019 | Dmitriy Nikolayevich PLISHKIN 2000 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Perm
| Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Perm Regional Court 06/03/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
50290/19 09/09/2019 | Sergey Alekseyevich OSOKIN 1989 |
| Krasnodar
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Krasnodar Regional Court 30/07/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
51747/19 22/09/2019 | Ivan Albertovich SHCHETININ 1996 | Yelanchik Oleg Aleksandrovich Moscow | Moscow
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 22/03/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses – inability to cross-examine in open court any witnesses, including police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based. | 3,500 | |
54204/19 07/10/2019 | Semen Valeryevich TARAKANOV 1987 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Perm
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Perm Regional Court | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
62601/19 23/11/2019 | Vyacheslav Aleksandrovich KHLYNOV 1999 | Dubinin Nikolay Anatolyevich Moscow | Moscow
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 28/05/2019 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 3,500 | |
64296/19 27/11/2019 | Nikita Aleksandrovich KHRAMOV 1995 | Nisanbekova Elza Rinatovna Kazan | Kazan
| Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 29/05/2019 | Art. 5 (1) – unlawful deprivation of liberty – escorting to a police station for compiling an offence report (arrested at 5 p.m. and brought to the police station at 5.25 p.m. on 09/09/2018; released at 1.35 a.m. on 10/09/2018);
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.